EcoGeek

Why gaming is green

I hear a lot about how geeks adversely impact the environment. With our power-sucking computers, toxic game consoles, and general disinterest in the outdoors. But I'm here, today to tell you that that's bunk. Geeks are greener than the average American, and it's time to point out why.

So we're starting a new series entitled "Why Geeks are Greener." And this is our first installment.

Video games, if you pay attention to the traditional green establishment, are the anti-christ. Not only do they gobble up power, they keep our kids from being at one with nature. And if kids can't be at one with nature, why will the protect it!?

*sigh*

Well folks, I'm here today to tell you that gaming is good for the environment. Whether you are right now experiencing shock, cynicism or relief, you'll want to read the following list of why games are green.

  1. Children don't need Boy Scouts to care about global warming. I will fully admit to have been affected greatly in my experiences in the outdoors. But saying that caring about the environment is dependent on experiencing nature is like saying that caring about sex is dependent upon talking to girls. Just because you haven't experienced it doesn't mean you don't want to do all you can to protect your chances at having a healthy future with it. Protecting nature isn't about loving nature anymore, it's about liking the idea of life continuing on the planet.

  2. Gaming isn't that power intensive. Depending on what kind of system you have, your console might draw as much power as a CFL, or an incandescent lightbulb. Yes, the Wii is far more efficient than the XBox 360, but even the 360 only pulls a maximum of 150 watts. It's just not that much power, especially because neither pull much power at all when they're off. And the act of gaming itself, it turns out, is quite good for the environment.

  3. Gaming keeps you out of the environment, and thus protects it. If every gamer decided to be a skier, air travel rates would skyrocket, new ski mountains would be developed, and millions more people would all fly or drive thousands of miles per summer to get to their favorite destination. Instead, their favorite destination is the living room.

    From there, we gamers get to have intense experiences and hang out with our friends who might live half the world away with only a tiny impact on the environment. It's a non-physical realm that allows for pseudo-physical experiences. And while traditional greens call that a replacement of the real world, I call it a protection of the real world.

  4. Games are economic drivers with very little physical presence. I'd guess that your average copy of Halo 3 contains about $2 of raw materials. But when it hit stores it was worth $60. Where does all that money go? Well, into the pockets of the thousands of people who worked to create it. Actors, programmers, modelers, QA testers, musicians, artists, and BFG designers.

    So you get to employ thousands of people to produce a product that has a tiny environmental impact. And as the internet gets faster, the physical media is being eliminated from the process entirely.

  5. Computer gaming requires nothing physical at all. At various times throughout the day, my computer goes through a transition from workstation to gaming console. The result is that I don't need a gaming console at all, and I get to play games that I have never owned physical copies of. Aside from the 100 watts of power it pulls from the wall (far less carbon intensive than, say, a drive down to the nearest soccer pitch) I can play Fifa 08 with my wife. I'm not getting any fitter, that's for certain, but the cost to the environment is virtually nonexistent.

There are, of course, ungreen things about gaming too. If you do it on a 42 inch plasma-screen HDTV, for example, you're going overboard. And running out to buy the new console as soon as it comes out isn't a very green policy, especially since Super Mario Bros. remains as fun today as it was in 1987. And the NES, I'll add, is a very green machine.

But be secure in knowing that your ultra-green friends who drive into the wilderness to have their experiences have no right to scoff at the ways in which you have yours.

Email IM Bookmark del.icio.us Digg

You do not appear to have Yahoo! Messenger installed. Click here to download and install it.

Email this article

There is a problem with one or more email addresses entered

Enter email addresses, separated by commas.

There is a problem with the email address entered

Email addresses will only be used to email this information on your behalf and will not be used for any marketing purposes.

comments from our community

Showing 1 - 7 of 7 comments

Post Comment
  • Posted by PaulK Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:43am PDT
    No, point #3 is morally wrong. One or more computer games with GPS should be designed, to push kids into the outdoor environment.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Kelly C Mon Nov 3, 2008 8:45am PST
    Actually I 100% agree with you. My Mother always fussed at me when I was younger but when I turned into an adult and actually went out into the world to do the stuff I wanted to do she wanted me at home... So I picked up World of Warcraft and that is now my addiction... my free time is spent playing WoW instead of mall hopping or going out... which means 1. I'm safe at home. 2. I'm not wasting gas or contributing to any pollution of the environment. and 3. I'm having a ball of a time! I think gaming is a great way to stimulate your mind and with the Wii also is a way to get fit without running to a gym :) Kudos on this blog!
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by king_of_the_4string Mon Nov 3, 2008 10:09am PST
    WOO! I agree! Gamers are green! See now i can tell my Every one im good for the environment.!!!!
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Jonathan F Sun Nov 9, 2008 5:33pm PST
    You completely distorted facts to suit your own selfish excuses. Ignorence must truly be bliss. The worst problem about the internet is that it gives a medium for morons like you to speak. You should put this junk on youtube like the rest.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by umar999 Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:14am PST
    Johnathan F, if you wish to disagree with the author, please provide a reasonable argument to counter the author's claims. Simply stating the author is "distorting facts to suit his own selfish excuses" is no argument at all. All you've done is the equivalent of mud-slinging and name-calling. Here, I'll give you an example: I disagree with some of your points, Hank. Notably 1 and 3. While someone may be intellectually aware of the need to preserve the environment, true appreciation for (and therefore a larger commitment to) the environment is difficult without having experienced it first. There is no carnal desire to protect our ecosystem as there might be to mate... the analogy is weak, at best. Moreover, no one said it would be necessary for outdoor activities to entail any driving or resort-visiting at all. Last time I checked, biking, track, ultimate frisbee, kickball, or a walk to the local park doesn't harm the environment at all. Plus, it'll keep you fit and healthy... avoiding a sedentary lifestyle and the risk of atherosclerosis with its derivative health issues.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Mr. Noah Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:43am PST
    Wow.. What a clever way to completely distort reality to best suit your argument. 1. Protecting something has nothing to do with how much you like it. It is about physically making an effort to protect it. A person can talk about protecting something till they are blue in the face, but unless they actually make an effort to do so it has no relevance. 2. Using any amount of power is more than using none I do believe. 3. Again with the twisted idea of protection. If your thesis were true than I am protecting everyone in the world by not attacking them. Wow, I'm a super hero. 4.http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_23014.aspx Video game consoles are toxic. Doesn't sound very healthy for me or the environment. 5. A sedentary lifestyle leads to many health risks which can eventually lead to a huge cost on the environment and your country. Agreeing with umar999, the cost to walk in the park or participate in numerous other healthy outdoor activities has virtually no impact on the environment. Lastly, I play video games. I like them and enjoy them, but to say that I am doing good things for the environment by playing them would just be a ridiculous statement.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Mike S Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:08am PST
    Interesting arguments, but I don't think it's reasonable to say that video game players are inherently green. I think it's more accurate to say that playing Video Games is *greener* than some other types of activities one might be doing. I also don't buy the idea that sitting on your ass is actually helping the environment; being proactive and conscientious, on the other hand, that helps the environment.
    Report Abuse

Leave a Comment:

You must first sign in.

Green Picks Playlist